State of Maharashtra vs Raju Kumar Ghansham Mhato — 198/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060003542025

Filing Number

271/2025

Filing Date

24-Mar-2025

Registration No

198/2025

Registration Date

01-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju Kumar Ghansham Mhato

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Raju Kumar Ghansham Mhato (198/2025) The court discontinued proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged the accused of charges under Section 184 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The court found that after 11 months, despite multiple efforts, the accused remained untraceable and the case—punishable only by fine—had no substance to remain pending indefinitely. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 12-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 13-Sep-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  6. 30-Jul-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  7. 10-May-2025

    First Order

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  8. 16-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 198/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Raju Kumar Ghansham Mhato (198/2025) The court discontinued proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged the accused of charges under Section 184 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The court found that after 11 months, despite multiple efforts, the accused remained untraceable and the case—punishable only by fine—had no substance to remain pending indefinitely. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case