State of Maharashtra vs Pravin Balaram Patil — 176/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 122,177. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060003092025

Filing Number

236/2025

Filing Date

20-Mar-2025

Registration No

176/2025

Registration Date

20-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 122,177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pravin Balaram Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra vs. Pravin Balaram Patil (176/2025) The court stopped proceedings against accused Pravin Balaram Patil under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and discharged him from Motor Vehicle Act violations (Sections 122/177). The court found that after over a year, despite multiple efforts, the accused could not be traced, and continuing to keep the case pending was unjustified for a fine-only offense. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 12-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 13-Sep-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  6. 30-Jul-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  7. 10-May-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  8. 22-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 176/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra vs. Pravin Balaram Patil (176/2025) The court stopped proceedings against accused Pravin Balaram Patil under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and discharged him from Motor Vehicle Act violations (Sections 122/177). The court found that after over a year, despite multiple efforts, the accused could not be traced, and continuing to keep the case pending was unjustified for a fine-only offense. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case