Janardan Damaji Patil vs Balaram Damaji Patil — 33/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG060002032026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

77/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Janardan Damaji Patil

    Adv. RAHUL GAJANAN PEDHAVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balaram Damaji Patil

  2. 2.Laxman Damaji Patil

  3. 3.Somnath Damaji Patil

  4. 4.Surekha Ramakrishna Patil

  5. 5.Gaurav Ramakrishna Patil

  6. 6.Pranali Ramakrishna Patil

  7. 7.Praveena Ramakrishna Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Civil Judge at Pen disposed of a partition, possession, and declaration suit between Janaradan and Balaram through a compromise settlement after both parties voluntarily agreed to amicable resolution. The court accepted the compromise deed (Exhibit 12) and ordered the suit to be disposed as compromised subject to provisions of the Fragmentation Act, with a decree to be drawn accordingly and court fees to be refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge at Pen disposed of a partition, possession, and declaration suit between Janaradan and Balaram through a compromise settlement after both parties voluntarily agreed to amicable resolution. The court accepted the compromise deed (Exhibit 12) and ordered the suit to be disposed as compromised subject to provisions of the Fragmentation Act, with a decree to be drawn accordingly and court fees to be refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case