State vs Harshadkumar Balaji Gaikwad — 72/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060001982025

Filing Number

127/2025

Filing Date

05-Mar-2025

Registration No

72/2025

Registration Date

05-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Harshadkumar Balaji Gaikwad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pen, stopped proceedings against accused Harshadkumar Balaji Gaikwad under Section 258 of the CrPC for a Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 offense (drunk driving). The court discharged the accused as he remained untraceable for over a year and the offense carried only a fine penalty, making further delay unjustified. Police records were retained for potential case reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 13-Sep-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  6. 28-Jul-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  7. 10-May-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  8. 22-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pen, stopped proceedings against accused Harshadkumar Balaji Gaikwad under Section 258 of the CrPC for a Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 offense (drunk driving). The court discharged the accused as he remained untraceable for over a year and the offense carried only a fine penalty, making further delay unjustified. Police records were retained for potential case reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case