Sunanda bharat patil vs None — 37/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2A. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG060001432025
e-Filing Number
18-02-2025
Filing Number
47/2025
Filing Date
18-02-2025
Registration No
37/2025
Registration Date
24-02-2025
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunanda bharat patil
Adv. MHATRE AMITA KAILASH
Abhijeet Bharat Patil
Adv. MHATRE AMITA KAILASH
Prafull Bharat Patil
Adv. MHATRE AMITA KAILASH
Respondent(s)
None
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
Disposed
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | Compliance | |
| 24-02-2026 | Compliance | |
| 29-01-2026 | Compliance | |
| 13-01-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Civil Court at Pen, Maharashtra approved an application for a heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827. The court found that applicants 1-3 (Sunanda Bharat Patil, Abhijit Bharat Patil, and Prabhudev Bharat Patil) are the legal heirs of deceased Bharat Ramdas Patil and are entitled to receive the heirship certificate upon payment of appropriate stamp duty. The court noted that no objections were filed and all required documentary evidence was properly submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Court at Pen, Maharashtra approved an application for a heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827. The court found that applicants 1-3 (Sunanda Bharat Patil, Abhijit Bharat Patil, and Prabhudev Bharat Patil) are the legal heirs of deceased Bharat Ramdas Patil and are entitled to receive the heirship certificate upon payment of appropriate stamp duty. The court noted that no objections were filed and all required documentary evidence was properly submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts