Yogesh Ramesh Kothekar vs Ramesh Haribhau Kothekar — 23/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG060001232026

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

23/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yogesh Ramesh Kothekar

    Adv. MHATRE BHAGVAN VITTHAL

  2. 2.Pratik Ramesh Kothekar

    Adv. MHATRE BHAGVAN VITTHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Haribhau Kothekar

  2. 2.Sharada Ramesh Kothekar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Lok Adalat at Vadkhal Grampanchayat accepted a compromise settlement (Exh. 11) in a partition suit filed by two sons against their parents regarding agricultural land (Gat No. 57/2). The court approved the agreed partition, ordered preparation of an award with a hand-sketch map, directed its transmission to the Revenue Department for implementation, and refunded the court fee to the plaintiff while closing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat at Vadkhal Grampanchayat accepted a compromise settlement (Exh. 11) in a partition suit filed by two sons against their parents regarding agricultural land (Gat No. 57/2). The court approved the agreed partition, ordered preparation of an award with a hand-sketch map, directed its transmission to the Revenue Department for implementation, and refunded the court fee to the plaintiff while closing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case