State of Maharashtra vs Sumitra Ramchandra Bhure — 52/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060001052025

Filing Number

75/2025

Filing Date

29-Jan-2025

Registration No

52/2025

Registration Date

30-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

193

Police Station

Nagothane

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sumitra Ramchandra Bhure

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court discharged accused Sumitra Ramchandra Bhure of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by stopping proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The decision was based on the case being pending for 14 months with the accused failing to appear and the prosecution unable to file the required chemical analysis report despite sufficient opportunities, rendering further delay unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 27-Nov-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  6. 20-Sep-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  7. 16-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  8. 17-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  9. 06-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged accused Sumitra Ramchandra Bhure of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by stopping proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The decision was based on the case being pending for 14 months with the accused failing to appear and the prosecution unable to file the required chemical analysis report despite sufficient opportunities, rendering further delay unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case