Prakash Dhau Jadhav vs Girish Mahadev Pawar — 18/2024
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 29th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG060000852024
e-Filing Number
02-02-2024
Filing Number
36/2024
Filing Date
02-02-2024
Registration No
18/2024
Registration Date
03-02-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash Dhau Jadhav
Adv. MHATRE AMITA KAILASH
Respondent(s)
Girish Mahadev Pawar
Harshad Mahadev Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 31-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court disposed of the suit as compromised through mediation between petitioner Prakash Jadhav and respondents Girish and Harshad Pawar. After verifying the voluntary consent of both parties, the court incorporated the settlement terms (Pursis) and mediation report into the decree and ordered refund of court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court disposed of the suit as compromised through mediation between petitioner Prakash Jadhav and respondents Girish and Harshad Pawar. After verifying the voluntary consent of both parties, the court incorporated the settlement terms (Pursis) and mediation report into the decree and ordered refund of court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts