State of Maharashtra vs Sanjay Hiraman Kambale — 25/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060000502025

Filing Number

36/2025

Filing Date

09-Jan-2025

Registration No

25/2025

Registration Date

09-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Hiraman Kambale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Sanjay Hiraman Kamble of charges under section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act and stopped proceedings under section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, citing the accused's non-appearance despite efforts to trace him and the case being over a year old with only fine-level punishment. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under section 300(5) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  6. 13-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  7. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  8. 10-May-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  9. 22-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  10. 15-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 09-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Sanjay Hiraman Kamble of charges under section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act and stopped proceedings under section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, citing the accused's non-appearance despite efforts to trace him and the case being over a year old with only fine-level punishment. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under section 300(5) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case