Suresh Vankvani Proprietor Of M/s Ram Developers vs Bhalchandra Thakur (deceased) Through His Legal Heirs — 421/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 15,19,22,31and37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHRG040038992023
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
24-11-2023
Filing Number
10596/2023
Filing Date
27-11-2023
Registration No
421/2023
Registration Date
28-12-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
3-3rd Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, S.D.PANVEL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Vankvani Proprietor Of M/s Ram Developers
Adv. TRIPATHI RAMESH CHANDRA S N
Respondent(s)
Bhalchandra Thakur (deceased) Through His Legal Heirs
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, S.D.PANVEL
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-01-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 07-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Special Civil Suit No. 421/2023 - Suresh Nakwani v. Bhalchandra Thakur The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint filed under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(D). The court found that the original suit filed on 22/12/2010 was barred by limitation under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, Section 159-A and First Schedule Section 9(1)(b), as the plaintiff failed to file it within six months of the cause of action and did not provide the mandatory notice to the competent authority. The suit was consequently declared time-barred and liable to be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Special Civil Suit No. 421/2023 - Suresh Nakwani v. Bhalchandra Thakur The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint filed under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(D). The court found that the original suit filed on 22/12/2010 was barred by limitation under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, Section 159-A and First Schedule Section 9(1)(b), as the plaintiff failed to file it within six months of the cause of action and did not provide the mandatory notice to the competent authority. The suit was consequently declared time-barred and liable to be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts