Hiravati Vijay Sing and Others vs Jagannath Ramchandra NalavdeThrough Madhukarrao Prabhakar Borkar and Others — 400076/2018
Case under Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 6. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHRG040037512016
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4000099/2018
Filing Date
31-01-2018
Registration No
400076/2018
Registration Date
03-02-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
5-4th Jt.CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION PANVEL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hiravati Vijay Sing and Others
Adv. Amar Patvardhan
Ajit S. Sing
Respondent(s)
Jagannath Ramchandra NalavdeThrough Madhukarrao Prabhakar Borkar and Others
The Manager
The Addl. Estate Officer
The Vhijilence Officer
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th Jt.CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION PANVEL
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 05-02-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 16-01-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 14-10-2025 | Unready Board | |
| 23-07-2025 | Unready Board |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partially allowed the temporary injunction application filed by Hiravati against Jagannath (Defendant No. 1) in a property dispute case. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case of contractual rights and possession of the suit property based on an agreement of sale dated 10/08/2007, and that irreparable loss would result if the injunction were refused. However, the application was dismissed against Defendants 2-4 (CIDCO Authority) as they were not parties to the contract. Defendant No. 1 and all persons acting through him were restrained from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession or creating third-party interests until disposal of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court partially allowed the temporary injunction application filed by Hiravati against Jagannath (Defendant No. 1) in a property dispute case. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case of contractual rights and possession of the suit property based on an agreement of sale dated 10/08/2007, and that irreparable loss would result if the injunction were refused. However, the application was dismissed against Defendants 2-4 (CIDCO Authority) as they were not parties to the contract. Defendant No. 1 and all persons acting through him were restrained from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession or creating third-party interests until disposal of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts