Hiravati Vijay Sing and Others vs Jagannath Ramchandra NalavdeThrough Madhukarrao Prabhakar Borkar and Others — 400076/2018

Case under Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 6. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Unready Board Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHRG040037512016

Filing Number

4000099/2018

Filing Date

31-Jan-2018

Registration No

400076/2018

Registration Date

03-Feb-2018

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

5-4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hiravati Vijay Sing and Others

    Adv. Amar Patvardhan

  2. 2.Ajit S. Sing

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jagannath Ramchandra NalavdeThrough Madhukarrao Prabhakar Borkar and Others

  2. 2.The Manager

  3. 3.The Addl. Estate Officer

  4. 4.The Vhijilence Officer

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Unready Board

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Unready Board

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Unready Board

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  5. 14-Oct-2025

    Unready Board

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  6. 23-Jul-2025

    Unready Board

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  7. 19-Apr-2025

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  8. 05-Feb-2025

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  9. 25-Oct-2024

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  10. 27-Jun-2024

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  11. 22-Apr-2024

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  12. 06-Mar-2024

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  13. 19-Jan-2024

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  14. 09-Dec-2023

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  15. 09-Sep-2023

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  16. 30-Apr-2023

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  17. 11-Feb-2023

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  18. 12-Nov-2022

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  19. 13-Aug-2022

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  20. 13-Aug-2022

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  21. 25-Jul-2022

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  22. 16-Apr-2022

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  23. 21-Mar-2022

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  24. 16-Feb-2022

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  25. 12-Nov-2021

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  26. 14-Jul-2021

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  27. 24-Mar-2021

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  28. 17-Dec-2020

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  29. 26-Nov-2020

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  30. 05-Oct-2020

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  31. 04-Aug-2020

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  32. 04-May-2020

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  33. 27-Mar-2020

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  34. 14-Feb-2020

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  35. 13-Dec-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  36. 06-Aug-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  37. 06-Jul-2019

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The court partially allowed the temporary injunction application filed by Hiravati against Jagannath (Defendant No. 1) in a property dispute case. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case of contractual rights and possession of the suit property based on an agreement of sale dated 10/08/2007, and that irreparable loss would result if the injunction were refused. However, the application was dismissed against Defendants 2-4 (CIDCO Authority) as they were not parties to the contract. Defendant No. 1 and all persons acting through him were restrained from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession or creating third-party interests until disposal of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  38. 06-Jul-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  39. 14-Jun-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  40. 17-Apr-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  41. 09-Apr-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  42. 15-Mar-2019

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  43. 15-Mar-2019

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  44. 15-Mar-2019

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  45. 15-Mar-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  46. 26-Feb-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  47. 11-Jan-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  48. 30-Nov-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  49. 12-Oct-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  50. 07-Sep-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  51. 17-Aug-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  52. 10-Aug-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  53. 02-Aug-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  54. 13-Jul-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  55. 29-Jun-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  56. 08-Jun-2018

    Unready Board

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  57. 10-Apr-2018

    Unready Board

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  58. 12-Mar-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 31-Jan-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 400076/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partially allowed the temporary injunction application filed by Hiravati against Jagannath (Defendant No. 1) in a property dispute case. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case of contractual rights and possession of the suit property based on an agreement of sale dated 10/08/2007, and that irreparable loss would result if the injunction were refused. However, the application was dismissed against Defendants 2-4 (CIDCO Authority) as they were not parties to the contract. Defendant No. 1 and all persons acting through him were restrained from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession or creating third-party interests until disposal of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case