Smt. Roma Manoharlal Krishnani Through Raj Manoharlal Krishnani and Others vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Raigad and Others — 400303/2017

Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG040037082016

Filing Number

400303/2017

Filing Date

03-Nov-2017

Registration No

400303/2017

Registration Date

23-Nov-2017

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

4-2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Roma Manoharlal Krishnani Through Raj Manoharlal Krishnani and Others

    Adv. Deepak Gaikwad

  2. 2.Avinash Manoharlal Krishnani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Raigad and Others

  2. 2.The Addl. Division Officer

  3. 3.The Tahashildar Khalapur

  4. 4.The Mandal Officer Khopoli

  5. 5.The Talathi

  6. 6.Shirvaram Kutti Shetti

  7. 7.Ashok Lalit Hajara

  8. 8.Lilavati Sadanand Shetti

  9. 9.Smita Rajesh Shetti

  10. 10.M/s. Watore Group Of Industrij Through Watore Maya Premdas

  11. 11.Parvati Dehu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  12. 12.Suresh Dehu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  13. 13.Dattarey Dehu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  14. 14.Anant Dehu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  15. 15.Rambhau Kanu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  16. 16.Damu Kanu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  17. 17.Dagadu Bhanu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  18. 18.Ashok Bhanu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  19. 19.Kaluram Bhanu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  20. 20.Mandabai Bhanu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  21. 21.Janabai Engal Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  22. 22.Usha Babu Male Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  23. 23.Manu Laxman PangaraThrough Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

  24. 24.Sandhya Dehu Patil Through Jagnnath Parshuram Patil

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  4. 09-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  5. 07-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  6. 12-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  7. 27-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  8. 08-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  9. 09-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  10. 17-Aug-2024

    Issues

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  11. 01-Aug-2024

    Issues

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  12. 20-Jun-2024

    Issues

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  13. 21-Mar-2024

    Issues

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  14. 11-Jan-2024

    Reply/Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  15. 09-Nov-2023

    Reply/Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  16. 31-Aug-2023

    Reply/Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  17. 20-Jul-2023

    Reply/Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  18. 27-Apr-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  19. 09-Mar-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  20. 19-Jan-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  21. 16-Nov-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  22. 13-Oct-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  23. 23-Jun-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  24. 03-Mar-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  25. 20-Jan-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  26. 23-Dec-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  27. 28-Oct-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  28. 08-Jul-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  29. 06-Apr-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  30. 18-Dec-2020

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  31. 22-Sep-2020

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  32. 16-Jul-2020

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  33. 16-Apr-2020

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  34. 09-Jan-2020

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  35. 19-Sep-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  36. 01-Aug-2019

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 303/2017 (Roma vs State of Maharashtra) Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction with costs. Facts: Smt. Roma Manoharlal Krishnani sought a temporary injunction to restrain defendants from interfering with her possession of tenancy land and from creating third-party interests. She claimed ownership based on a registered Sale Deed dated 10/07/1967 from original holder Dehu Kanu Patil. However, the mutation entry was not finalized due to the property being classified as a "fragment" under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Land Holdings Act, 1947. Subsequently, defendants 11-24 (heirs of Dehu) transferred the property to defendant 10 in 1997, who then sold it to defendants 6-9 in 2017. Court's Findings: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The Sale Deed violated the Consolidation Act and was never formally validated; the plaintiff did not challenge the adverse revenue entries for 69 years; revenue records showed defendants' continuous possession, not the plaintiff's; and the plaintiff has alternative statutory remedies under revenue law. The court also held that civil jurisdiction is barred under Section 158 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for matters concerning revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  37. 01-Aug-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  38. 25-Jul-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  39. 18-Jul-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  40. 11-Jul-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  41. 27-Jun-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  42. 13-Jun-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  43. 25-Apr-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  44. 18-Apr-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  45. 28-Mar-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  46. 07-Mar-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  47. 07-Feb-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  48. 17-Jan-2019

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  49. 13-Dec-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  50. 29-Nov-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  51. 15-Nov-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  52. 11-Oct-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  53. 27-Sep-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  54. 09-Aug-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  55. 21-Jun-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  56. 27-Apr-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  57. 05-Apr-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  58. 08-Mar-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  59. 15-Feb-2018

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  60. 11-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 03-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 400303/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 303/2017 (Roma vs State of Maharashtra) Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction with costs. Facts: Smt. Roma Manoharlal Krishnani sought a temporary injunction to restrain defendants from interfering with her possession of tenancy land and from creating third-party interests. She claimed ownership based on a registered Sale Deed dated 10/07/1967 from original holder Dehu Kanu Patil. However, the mutation entry was not finalized due to the property being classified as a "fragment" under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Land Holdings Act, 1947. Subsequently, defendants 11-24 (heirs of Dehu) transferred the property to defendant 10 in 1997, who then sold it to defendants 6-9 in 2017. Court's Findings: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The Sale Deed violated the Consolidation Act and was never formally validated; the plaintiff did not challenge the adverse revenue entries for 69 years; revenue records showed defendants' continuous possession, not the plaintiff's; and the plaintiff has alternative statutory remedies under revenue law. The court also held that civil jurisdiction is barred under Section 158 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for matters concerning revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case