Shri. Sajan J. Bhojawani vs M/s. Laxmi Interprises Through Shri. Shailesh J. Dawda — 400042/2018
Case under Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 6. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHRG040036652016
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4000071/2018
Filing Date
12-01-2018
Registration No
400042/2018
Registration Date
17-01-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Sajan J. Bhojawani
Adv. G. N. Patil
Respondent(s)
M/s. Laxmi Interprises Through Shri. Shailesh J. Dawda
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 07-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 05-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment. The plaintiff sought to correct the title clause of the plaint to reflect the correct name "Sajan Jessaram Bhojwani (HUF)" instead of "Sajan J. Bhojwani," as all official documents and payments were made under the correct HUF designation. The judge held that the proposed amendment would not change the nature of the suit and was necessary for deciding the case on merit, hence permitted the amendment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment. The plaintiff sought to correct the title clause of the plaint to reflect the correct name "Sajan Jessaram Bhojwani (HUF)" instead of "Sajan J. Bhojwani," as all official documents and payments were made under the correct HUF designation. The judge held that the proposed amendment would not change the nature of the suit and was necessary for deciding the case on merit, hence permitted the amendment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts