PRANAV NANA KOKARE vs Nil — 713/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13 B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition

CNR: MHRG040036292025

e-Filing Number

29-10-2025

Filing Number

3916/2025

Filing Date

30-Oct-2025

Registration No

713/2025

Registration Date

11-Nov-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

5-4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13 B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRANAV NANA KOKARE

    Adv. LOKARE KAILASH DNYANOBA

  2. 2.SNEHA PRANAV KOKARE ALIAS SNEHA SUNIL BORGE

    Adv. LOKARE KAILASH DNYANOBA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court granted a mutual divorce petition filed by Mr. Pranav Nana Kokare and Mrs. Sneha Pranav Kokare under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple, married on April 13, 2023, had been living separately for over two years with irreconcilable differences and no possibility of reconciliation. The court verified their free consent without coercion, waived the mandatory six-month cooling period, and dissolved their marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  4. 21-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 713/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted a mutual divorce petition filed by Mr. Pranav Nana Kokare and Mrs. Sneha Pranav Kokare under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple, married on April 13, 2023, had been living separately for over two years with irreconcilable differences and no possibility of reconciliation. The court verified their free consent without coercion, waived the mandatory six-month cooling period, and dissolved their marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case