Pandarinath Gauru Kanghe vs Deputy Collector Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer Karjat — 128/2024
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28 A (3). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHRG040033942024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
13-08-2024
Filing Number
3416/2024
Filing Date
08-10-2024
Registration No
128/2024
Registration Date
08-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
3-3rd Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, S.D.PANVEL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandarinath Gauru Kanghe
Adv. Sushant P. Gharat
Respondent(s)
Deputy Collector Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer Karjat
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, S.D.PANVEL
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 03-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court order document (Case No. 128/2024) is a procedural order from a Maharashtra court dated 28-10-2025, addressing four substantive issues: whether the petitioner received lower compensation than non-petitioners, whether the petitioner is entitled to increased damages, whether the petition was filed within the prescribed time limit, and what orders/directions should be issued. However, the document itself does not contain the actual judgment or orders passed—it only lists the issues to be decided and is signed by a senior-level judge (Rajshri M. Gupaveer), indicating this is a case header or preliminary order requiring further substantive determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order document (Case No. 128/2024) is a procedural order from a Maharashtra court dated 28-10-2025, addressing four substantive issues: whether the petitioner received lower compensation than non-petitioners, whether the petitioner is entitled to increased damages, whether the petition was filed within the prescribed time limit, and what orders/directions should be issued. However, the document itself does not contain the actual judgment or orders passed—it only lists the issues to be decided and is signed by a senior-level judge (Rajshri M. Gupaveer), indicating this is a case header or preliminary order requiring further substantive determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts