ANJALI NILESH SONAVANE ALIAS ANJALI KASHINATH SURADKAR vs Nil — 576/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13 B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition

CNR: MHRG040029082025

e-Filing Number

13-08-2025

Filing Number

3064/2025

Filing Date

18-Aug-2025

Registration No

576/2025

Registration Date

30-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13 B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANJALI NILESH SONAVANE ALIAS ANJALI KASHINATH SURADKAR

    Adv. THAKARE SHANKESH RAJESH

  2. 2.NILESH RAMRAO SONAVANE

    Adv. THAKARE SHANKESH RAJESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge at Panvel granted a mutual divorce petition filed by both spouses under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple, married on 19 April 2022, had been living separately for over a year and both parties consented to dissolution of marriage due to incompatibility and irretrievable breakdown. The court, after verifying all required documents and confirming the absence of coercion, approved the divorce effective from the date of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel

  6. 10-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 576/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge at Panvel granted a mutual divorce petition filed by both spouses under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple, married on 19 April 2022, had been living separately for over a year and both parties consented to dissolution of marriage due to incompatibility and irretrievable breakdown. The court, after verifying all required documents and confirming the absence of coercion, approved the divorce effective from the date of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case