Amit Kumar Mahabirprasad Agarwal POWER OF ATTORNEY Mr Mahabirprasad Banwarilal Agarwal vs Deputy Collector Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Office Karjat — 38/2025
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section Section- 28 A (3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHRG040024582025
e-Filing Number
04-05-2025
Filing Number
2596/2025
Filing Date
20-06-2025
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
20-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amit Kumar Mahabirprasad Agarwal POWER OF ATTORNEY Mr Mahabirprasad Banwarilal Agarwal
Respondent(s)
Deputy Collector Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Office Karjat
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 31-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially approved the claimant's reference petition under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The claimant sought additional compensation for acquired agricultural land in Sarsan village (0.28 hectares) for the Mumbai-Pune expressway, claiming the land's non-agricultural potential was not adequately considered in valuation. The court, after analyzing comparable land acquisitions in the same notification date and considering the land's proximity to industrial areas, infrastructure, and development potential, awarded additional compensation at ₹600 per square meter instead of the original rate, along with interest, solatium, and cost recovery as per statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court partially approved the claimant's reference petition under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The claimant sought additional compensation for acquired agricultural land in Sarsan village (0.28 hectares) for the Mumbai-Pune expressway, claiming the land's non-agricultural potential was not adequately considered in valuation. The court, after analyzing comparable land acquisitions in the same notification date and considering the land's proximity to industrial areas, infrastructure, and development potential, awarded additional compensation at ₹600 per square meter instead of the original rate, along with interest, solatium, and cost recovery as per statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts