Smt Chandrabhaga Alias Lila Kashinath Puri vs Deputy Collector Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Office Karjat — 34/2025
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section Section- 28 A (3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHRG040024512025
e-Filing Number
04-05-2025
Filing Number
2589/2025
Filing Date
20-06-2025
Registration No
34/2025
Registration Date
20-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Chandrabhaga Alias Lila Kashinath Puri
Respondent(s)
Deputy Collector Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Office Karjat
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 31-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially approved the petitioner's land acquisition reference application under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The court determined that the claimant is entitled to additional compensation at the rate of Rs. 600/- per square meter (against the earlier assessed Rs. 2,000/- base rate) for acquired agricultural land in Sarsan village near the Mumbai-Pune highway, considering the land's location, non-agricultural development potential, and comparable acquisitions in the region with similar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court partially approved the petitioner's land acquisition reference application under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The court determined that the claimant is entitled to additional compensation at the rate of Rs. 600/- per square meter (against the earlier assessed Rs. 2,000/- base rate) for acquired agricultural land in Sarsan village near the Mumbai-Pune highway, considering the land's location, non-agricultural development potential, and comparable acquisitions in the region with similar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts