Haji Yunus Haji Latif Aghadi And others vs Deputy Collector Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Office Karjat — 15/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section Section- 28 A (3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference

CNR: MHRG040024332025

e-Filing Number

05-05-2025

Filing Number

2571/2025

Filing Date

07-May-2025

Registration No

15/2025

Registration Date

07-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

4-2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section Section- 28 A (3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Haji Yunus Haji Latif Aghadi And others

  2. 2.Basri Haji Yunus Aghadi

  3. 3.Kamran Yunus Aghadi Power Of Attorney holder all Applicant Through

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deputy Collector Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Office Karjat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court partially approved the land acquisition reference case under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The court determined that the claimants' agricultural land at Dahivli village, acquired on 18/01/1996 for the Mumbai-Pune highway project, deserves enhanced compensation of Rs. 600 per sq.mt. (instead of Rs. 5,000 per sq.mt. initially offered by the government). The court also awarded 12% annual interest from the notification date until the special officer's award, 30% solatium, and 9-15% interest on the enhanced amount as per statutory provisions, recognizing the land's development potential due to its proximity to major infrastructure and industrial zones. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  13. 24-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  14. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  15. 06-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  16. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  17. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  18. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  19. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  20. 15-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  21. 03-Oct-2025

    Issues

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  22. 16-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  23. 01-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 07-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court partially approved the land acquisition reference case under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The court determined that the claimants' agricultural land at Dahivli village, acquired on 18/01/1996 for the Mumbai-Pune highway project, deserves enhanced compensation of Rs. 600 per sq.mt. (instead of Rs. 5,000 per sq.mt. initially offered by the government). The court also awarded 12% annual interest from the notification date until the special officer's award, 30% solatium, and 9-15% interest on the enhanced amount as per statutory provisions, recognizing the land's development potential due to its proximity to major infrastructure and industrial zones. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case