Dnyaneshwar Laxman Mokal vs Gopal Balaram Mhatre — 247/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section 34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHRG040020452025
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
20-06-2025
Filing Number
2180/2025
Filing Date
24-06-2025
Registration No
247/2025
Registration Date
25-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyaneshwar Laxman Mokal
Adv. MHATRE BHUSHAN MORESHWAR
Rohidas Laxman Mokal
Adv. MHATRE BHUSHAN MORESHWAR
Respondent(s)
Gopal Balaram Mhatre
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 18-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 28-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 18-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition is allowed. The court condoned the delay in filing the affidavit by Respondent No. 1-2, considering their medical condition (100% blindness, BP, and sugar issues), and directed that their affidavit be placed on record. The respondent is given permission to file the affidavit before the court as per the prescribed procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition is allowed. The court condoned the delay in filing the affidavit by Respondent No. 1-2, considering their medical condition (100% blindness, BP, and sugar issues), and directed that their affidavit be placed on record. The respondent is given permission to file the affidavit before the court as per the prescribed procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts