Mohan Ramchandra Gaikwad vs Controller Of Unauthorised Construction (south) — 177/2023
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 31. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG040017182023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-05-2023
Filing Number
40755/2023
Filing Date
03-05-2023
Registration No
177/2023
Registration Date
03-05-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
2-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohan Ramchandra Gaikwad
Adv. SHELAR GANESH HARISHCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
Controller Of Unauthorised Construction (south)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-01-2026 | Hearing Without W.S. |
| 15-01-2026 | Hearing Without W.S. |
| 27-11-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. |
Interim Orders
Summary: R.C.S. No. 177/2023 The court granted the defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" (no WS) order dated 14.09.2023. The court accepted the defendants' explanation that, as CIDCO officials engaged in unauthorized construction removal activities, they were unable to timely collect necessary documents to file their written statement within the prescribed period. The 57-day delay was condoned, and the no WS order was set aside, subject to the defendants paying Rs. 1,000 as cost to TLSA, Panvel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: R.C.S. No. 177/2023 The court granted the defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" (no WS) order dated 14.09.2023. The court accepted the defendants' explanation that, as CIDCO officials engaged in unauthorized construction removal activities, they were unable to timely collect necessary documents to file their written statement within the prescribed period. The 57-day delay was condoned, and the no WS order was set aside, subject to the defendants paying Rs. 1,000 as cost to TLSA, Panvel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts