Velji Visha Menat vs Shashikaran Urf Shashi Kiran janardan shetty — 138/2025

Summary: The court allowed the application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiffs. The court found that the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favour, and would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted. Accordingly, defendant no.3 is temporarily restrained from creating third-party interest in the suit property, changing its nature, or constructing anything on it until the suit's final decision. The court held that the unregistered MOU dated 11.01.2024 constitutes a binding and enforceable agreement to sell despite being titled a "Memorandum of Understanding," emphasizing that the document's nomenclature is not conclusive—the parties' actual intention matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.