Goma Dharma Patil vs may sub-divisional officer land acquisition — 32/2024

Case under Land Acquisition (amendment) Act Section 28A-(3). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference

CNR: MHRG040011052024

Arguments

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2024

Filing Number

1108/2024

Filing Date

15-03-2024

Registration No

32/2024

Registration Date

15-03-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act Section 28A-(3)

Petitioner(s)

Goma Dharma Patil

Adv. Mhatre S. A.

Respondent(s)

may sub-divisional officer land acquisition

Central Railway Division Deputy Chief Engineer Panvel Railway Station

Hearing History

Judge: 4-2nd CIVIL JUDGE S.D.PANVEL

24-04-2026

Arguments

17-04-2026

Arguments

10-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Evidence

Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed — The land acquisition direction petition (Petition No. 32/2024) challenging the acquisition of 3,300 sq. meters of agricultural land in Chikhale village at a rate of ₹1,500 per sq. meter was dismissed by the District Judge on March 6, 2026. The court held that the compensation offered by the land acquisition officer was reasonable and in accordance with applicable law, and rejected all contentions raised by the petitioner challenging the acquisition proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed — The land acquisition direction petition (Petition No. 32/2024) challenging the acquisition of 3,300 sq. meters of agricultural land in Chikhale village at a rate of ₹1,500 per sq. meter was dismissed by the District Judge on March 6, 2026. The court held that the compensation offered by the land acquisition officer was reasonable and in accordance with applicable law, and rejected all contentions raised by the petitioner challenging the acquisition proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case