Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Patil Through Jivdani Enterprises vs MIDC — 91/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36,37,38,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHRG040010322022

Filing Number

91/2022

Filing Date

14-Mar-2022

Registration No

91/2022

Registration Date

19-Mar-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

5-4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 36,37,38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Patil Through Jivdani Enterprises

    Adv. Mahesh M. Gunjal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MIDC

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Issues

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    Issues

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  4. 09-Dec-2025

    Issues

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    Issues

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  6. 15-Oct-2025

    Issues

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    Issues

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    Issues

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  9. 20-Jun-2025

    Issues

    4th Jt.CIVIL Judge Senior Division Panvel

  10. 21-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  11. 03-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  12. 25-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  13. 24-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  14. 08-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  15. 22-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  16. 06-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  17. 25-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  18. 24-Aug-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  19. 11-Aug-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  20. 29-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  21. 17-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  22. 09-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  23. 11-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  24. 21-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  25. 23-Sep-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Special Civil Suit No. 91/2022 Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Patil (Jivdani Enterprises) sought a temporary injunction to prevent MIDC from demolishing structures on plot 116/1 in Tondare village and evicting him. The court rejected the application, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction. The court determined that while plaintiff's ancestors originally owned the land, it was lawfully acquired by MIDC through the Collector, and plaintiff received compensation for the acquisition. The plaintiff's possession derived only through an oral contract with M/s. Bharat Udyog Limited (a third party), which had since terminated, and MIDC had no obligation to plaintiff. Accordingly, the temporary injunction application was dismissed on 23 September 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  26. 23-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  27. 21-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  28. 15-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  29. 29-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  30. 18-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  31. 16-Aug-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  32. 16-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  33. 10-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  34. 08-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  35. 06-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  36. 29-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  37. 21-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  38. 14-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  39. 05-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  40. 18-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  41. 08-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  42. 03-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  43. 31-May-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  44. 20-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  45. 21-Mar-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  46. 21-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 14-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 91/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Special Civil Suit No. 91/2022 Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Patil (Jivdani Enterprises) sought a temporary injunction to prevent MIDC from demolishing structures on plot 116/1 in Tondare village and evicting him. The court rejected the application, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction. The court determined that while plaintiff's ancestors originally owned the land, it was lawfully acquired by MIDC through the Collector, and plaintiff received compensation for the acquisition. The plaintiff's possession derived only through an oral contract with M/s. Bharat Udyog Limited (a third party), which had since terminated, and MIDC had no obligation to plaintiff. Accordingly, the temporary injunction application was dismissed on 23 September 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case