Satyapal Jain 2 vs Jijabai Maruti Kathawale 1 — 400416/2013

Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHRG040009552013

Filing Number

400416/2013

Filing Date

19-Oct-2013

Registration No

400416/2013

Registration Date

19-Oct-2013

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

4-2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Satyapal Jain 2

    Adv. Smt.Pragati Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jijabai Maruti Kathawale 1

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  3. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  4. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  5. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  6. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  7. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  8. 10-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  9. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  10. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  11. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  12. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  13. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  14. 13-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  15. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  16. 08-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  17. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  18. 26-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  19. 31-Aug-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  20. 24-Jul-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  21. 24-Apr-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  22. 16-Mar-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  23. 30-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  24. 28-Nov-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  25. 29-Sep-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  26. 21-Jul-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  27. 21-Apr-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  28. 10-Feb-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  29. 23-Nov-2021

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  30. 20-Aug-2021

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  31. 27-Apr-2021

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  32. 19-Jan-2021

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  33. 12-Oct-2020

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  34. 11-Aug-2020

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  35. 08-Jun-2020

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  36. 27-Feb-2020

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  37. 18-Jan-2020

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  38. 21-Dec-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  39. 28-Nov-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  40. 05-Oct-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  41. 23-Aug-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  42. 26-Jul-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  43. 15-Jun-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  44. 05-Mar-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  45. 05-Feb-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  46. 26-Nov-2018

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  47. 25-Sep-2018

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  48. 30-Aug-2018

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating tenancy lands. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they themselves were responsible for obtaining prior government permission under the Maharashtra Tenancy Act but took no action for 17-18 years. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold one property to Defendant No. 2 in 2013, which the court held was valid given the plaintiffs' inaction and delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  49. 30-Aug-2018

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  50. 21-Aug-2018

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  51. 06-Aug-2018

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  52. 09-Jul-2018

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  53. 07-Jun-2018

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt.CIVIL Judge, S.d.panvel

  54. 03-Apr-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  55. 28-Feb-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  56. 11-Jan-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  57. 21-Nov-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  58. 16-Oct-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  59. 28-Aug-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  60. 17-Jul-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  61. 28-Apr-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  62. 25-Jan-2017

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  63. 25-Jan-2017

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  64. 08-Dec-2016

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  65. 25-Oct-2016

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  66. 24-Aug-2016

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  67. 22-Jun-2016

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  68. 28-Mar-2016

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  69. 29-Jan-2016

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  70. 27-Nov-2015

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  71. 03-Oct-2015

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  72. 27-Aug-2015

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  73. 31-Jul-2015

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  74. 22-Apr-2015

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  75. 26-Mar-2015

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel

  76. 12-Feb-2015

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  77. 29-Dec-2014

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  78. 06-Nov-2014

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  79. 18-Sep-2014

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  80. 21-Aug-2014

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  81. 24-Jul-2014

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  82. 19-Jun-2014

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  83. 11-Apr-2014

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  84. 07-Mar-2014

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  85. 30-Dec-2013

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  86. 19-Dec-2013

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  87. 09-Dec-2013

    W.S. and Say

    2nd CIVIL Judge S.d.panvel

  88. 15-Nov-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  89. 19-Oct-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 400416/2013

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating tenancy lands. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they themselves were responsible for obtaining prior government permission under the Maharashtra Tenancy Act but took no action for 17-18 years. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold one property to Defendant No. 2 in 2013, which the court held was valid given the plaintiffs' inaction and delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case