Kashinath Dinkar Gaikar vs special land acquisition officer metro centre no 1 — 14/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 29 to 32. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th April 2026.
Other Misc.Appln. - Other Civil Misc.Application
CNR: MHRG040008242026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
909/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D. PANVEL
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kashinath Dinkar Gaikar
Adv. Hareshwar Dattatrey Mundhe
Arun Kashinath Gaikar
Adv. Hareshwar Dattatrey Mundhe
Vikas kashinath gaikar
Adv. Hareshwar Dattatrey Mundhe
Avinash Kashinath Gaikar
Adv. Hareshwar Dattatrey Mundhe
Anita Sanjay Mhatre
Adv. Hareshwar Dattatrey Mundhe
Priyal Indraraj Chaudhari
Adv. Hareshwar Dattatrey Mundhe
Ravindra Kashinath Gaikar
Adv. Hareshwar Dattatrey Mundhe
Respondent(s)
special land acquisition officer metro centre no 1
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D. PANVEL
Disposed
Arguments
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the applicants' application and ordered release of Rs. 7,35,901/- deposited in court vide case no. 379 on 22/08/2024, along with accrued interest, upon execution of an Indemnity Bond and proper identification. The decision was based on the finality of the Lokadalat Award dated 09/12/2017 that had compromised the original L.A.R. No. 190/2000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the applicants' application and ordered release of Rs. 7,35,901/- deposited in court vide case no. 379 on 22/08/2024, along with accrued interest, upon execution of an Indemnity Bond and proper identification. The decision was based on the finality of the Lokadalat Award dated 09/12/2017 that had compromised the original L.A.R. No. 190/2000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts