Archita Shekhar Bhagat vs Nil — 174/2026
Case under Hindu Marriages (validation of Proceedings) Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 05th May 2026.
Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition
CNR: MHRG040007802026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
865/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
174/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
2-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Archita Shekhar Bhagat
Adv. NANDGAONKAR NIKHIL HARISHCHANDRA
Shekhar Jaywant Bhagat
Adv. NANDGAONKAR NIKHIL HARISHCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 174/2026 Court Decision: The court granted the petition for mutual divorce filed by Archita Shekhar Bhagat and Shekhar Jaywant Bhagat under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. The marriage registered on 19 January 2025 in Karjat, Raigad district was dissolved, and a decree of divorce was issued. Key Reasoning: The court found that both petitioners had lived separately for over one year, were in agreement regarding the divorce, and had fulfilled all statutory requirements under Section 13-B. The petitioners' testimony and affidavits established their firm and mutual consent to dissolve the marriage. Petitioner 1 renounced her share in the conjugal property in favor of Petitioner 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 174/2026 Court Decision: The court granted the petition for mutual divorce filed by Archita Shekhar Bhagat and Shekhar Jaywant Bhagat under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. The marriage registered on 19 January 2025 in Karjat, Raigad district was dissolved, and a decree of divorce was issued. Key Reasoning: The court found that both petitioners had lived separately for over one year, were in agreement regarding the divorce, and had fulfilled all statutory requirements under Section 13-B. The petitioners' testimony and affidavits established their firm and mutual consent to dissolve the marriage. Petitioner 1 renounced her share in the conjugal property in favor of Petitioner 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts