Siddhant Changdev Pawar vs NIL — 137/2026
Case under Hindu Marriages (validation of Proceedings) Act Section 13(B) (1)(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition
CNR: MHRG040006112026
e-Filing Number
10-02-2026
Filing Number
670/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
137/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
3-3rd Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, S.D.PANVEL
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddhant Changdev Pawar
Adv. MHATRE SACHIN AMBAJI
Shradha siddhant pawar alias Shradha jagdish karpe
Adv. MHATRE SACHIN AMBAJI
Respondent(s)
NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, S.D.PANVEL
Disposed
Compromise
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-02-2026 | Compromise |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 137/2026 Petitioner(s): Siddhant Changdev Pawar and Shradha Siddhant Pawar (alias Shradha Jagdish Karpe) Court Decision: The court granted a mutual consent divorce under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioners, who were married on 29/11/2021 in Alibaug, Raigad District, had separated since 21/04/2023 due to irreconcilable differences. The court found no coercion, fraud, or wrongdoing, and both parties had agreed to dissolve the marriage with no pending financial or custodial disputes (the couple had no children). The divorce was finalized effective immediately, permitting both parties to pursue independent lives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 137/2026 Petitioner(s): Siddhant Changdev Pawar and Shradha Siddhant Pawar (alias Shradha Jagdish Karpe) Court Decision: The court granted a mutual consent divorce under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioners, who were married on 29/11/2021 in Alibaug, Raigad District, had separated since 21/04/2023 due to irreconcilable differences. The court found no coercion, fraud, or wrongdoing, and both parties had agreed to dissolve the marriage with no pending financial or custodial disputes (the couple had no children). The divorce was finalized effective immediately, permitting both parties to pursue independent lives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts