MS OM FREIGHT FORWARDERS LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR NEERAJ GUPTA vs PREMNATH SITARAM PATIL — 37/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 10 34. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHRG040002272026

W.S. and Say

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

262/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

27-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D. PANVEL

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 10 34

Petitioner(s)

MS OM FREIGHT FORWARDERS LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR NEERAJ GUPTA

Adv. RANE YOGESH PRABHAKAR

Respondent(s)

PREMNATH SITARAM PATIL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D. PANVEL

04-04-2026

W.S. and Say

20-03-2026

W.S. and Say

09-03-2026

W.S. and Say

06-03-2026

W.S. and Say

02-03-2026

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary In Special Suit No. 37 of 2026, OM Freight Forwarders Limited sought a temporary injunction against defendant Premnath Sitaram Patil to restrain him from creating third-party rights in suit property pending the case hearing scheduled for 7 March 2026. The court directed the defendant to maintain the status quo of the suit property and not create any third-party rights, title, or interest until the next hearing date. The defendant was further instructed not to alter the property's position during the suit's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Special Suit No. 37 of 2026, OM Freight Forwarders Limited sought a temporary injunction against defendant Premnath Sitaram Patil to restrain him from creating third-party rights in suit property pending the case hearing scheduled for 7 March 2026. The court directed the defendant to maintain the status quo of the suit property and not create any third-party rights, title, or interest until the next hearing date. The defendant was further instructed not to alter the property's position during the suit's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case