MS OM FREIGHT FORWARDERS LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR NEERAJ GUPTA vs PREMNATH SITARAM PATIL — 37/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 10 34. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHRG040002272026
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2026
Filing Number
262/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D. PANVEL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MS OM FREIGHT FORWARDERS LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR NEERAJ GUPTA
Adv. RANE YOGESH PRABHAKAR
Respondent(s)
PREMNATH SITARAM PATIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D. PANVEL
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 20-03-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 09-03-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 06-03-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 02-03-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Summary In Special Suit No. 37 of 2026, OM Freight Forwarders Limited sought a temporary injunction against defendant Premnath Sitaram Patil to restrain him from creating third-party rights in suit property pending the case hearing scheduled for 7 March 2026. The court directed the defendant to maintain the status quo of the suit property and not create any third-party rights, title, or interest until the next hearing date. The defendant was further instructed not to alter the property's position during the suit's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Special Suit No. 37 of 2026, OM Freight Forwarders Limited sought a temporary injunction against defendant Premnath Sitaram Patil to restrain him from creating third-party rights in suit property pending the case hearing scheduled for 7 March 2026. The court directed the defendant to maintain the status quo of the suit property and not create any third-party rights, title, or interest until the next hearing date. The defendant was further instructed not to alter the property's position during the suit's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts