Ms. Paradise Infra Pvt. Ltd. vs Umabai Dharma Patil - 5 Advocate - Dhadas Bhopi — 400107/2013
Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHRG040001802013
Filing Number
400107/2013
Filing Date
26-Feb-2013
Registration No
400107/2013
Registration Date
27-Feb-2013
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
2-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ms. Paradise Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Adv. M. K. Bhujbal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Umabai Dharma Patil - 5 Advocate - Dhadas Bhopi
Case History
-
13-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Dismissal Order
5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
-
05-Feb-2026
Dismissal Order
5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing
5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
-
18-Sep-2025
Hearing
5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
-
25-Aug-2025
Hearing
5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel
-
23-Jun-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
07-Feb-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
06-Dec-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
09-Oct-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
04-Sep-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
08-Aug-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
24-Jul-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
09-Jul-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
04-Mar-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
01-Feb-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the plaintiff's application to re-add CIDCO (defendant no.6/1 to 6/3) as a party to the suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 01-12-2011. The court found the application lacked merit because: (1) the plaintiff failed to issue mandatory notice under Section 159-A of the MRTP Act before seeking to add the statutory authority; (2) the six-month limitation period for filing suit after notice had expired; and (3) the plaintiff arbitrarily deleted and then attempted to re-add the defendants without valid cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Feb-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
31-Jan-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
06-Dec-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
04-Nov-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
11-Oct-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
06-Sep-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
21-Aug-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
08-Aug-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
27-Jun-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
10-Apr-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
13-Mar-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
23-Jan-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
16-Dec-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
04-Nov-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
15-Sep-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
08-Jul-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
25-Apr-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
21-Feb-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
20-Dec-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
25-Oct-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
02-Sep-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
13-Jul-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
09-Jun-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
23-Feb-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
08-Jan-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
26-Nov-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
21-Sep-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
27-Jul-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
27-Apr-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
20-Mar-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
27-Jan-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
26-Nov-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
11-Oct-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
09-Aug-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
15-Jul-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
08-Jul-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
10-Jun-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
03-Apr-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
13-Feb-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
20-Dec-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
27-Nov-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
09-Oct-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
02-Aug-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
07-Jun-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
08-Mar-2018
Issues
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
04-Jan-2018
Issues
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
16-Oct-2017
Issues
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
15-Jul-2017
Issues
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
15-Mar-2017
Issues
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
06-Jan-2017
Issues
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
26-Apr-2016
Issues
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
10-Feb-2016
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge, S.D. Panvel
-
02-Dec-2015
Issues
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
21-Oct-2015
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
09-Sep-2015
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
08-Jul-2015
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
25-Mar-2015
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
11-Feb-2015
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
20-Dec-2014
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
09-Oct-2014
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
22-Aug-2014
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
19-Jun-2014
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
27-Mar-2014
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
26-Feb-2014
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
04-Jan-2014
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
11-Nov-2013
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
03-Oct-2013
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
05-Aug-2013
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel
-
30-Jun-2013
Awaiting Summons
-
25-Jun-2013
Lok-Nyayalaya
-
21-Apr-2013
Notice_Unready
-
13-Apr-2013
Lok-Nyayalaya
-
02-Apr-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 400107/2013
Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the plaintiff's application to re-add CIDCO (defendant no.6/1 to 6/3) as a party to the suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 01-12-2011. The court found the application lacked merit because: (1) the plaintiff failed to issue mandatory notice under Section 159-A of the MRTP Act before seeking to add the statutory authority; (2) the six-month limitation period for filing suit after notice had expired; and (3) the plaintiff arbitrarily deleted and then attempted to re-add the defendants without valid cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts