State of Maharashtra through L K Gorane vs Kairav Doshi — 1024/2025
Case under Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963 Section Rule4(3). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG031918532025
e-Filing Number
15-10-2025
Filing Number
1901398/2025
Filing Date
16-Oct-2025
Registration No
1024/2025
Registration Date
16-Oct-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through L K Gorane
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kairav Doshi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raigad convicted Kairav Doshi, occupier of M/s. Kairav Chemofarbe Industries Ltd., for operating a factory without complying with approved plan conditions under Rule 4(3) of the Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 10,000 fine (with 10 days simple imprisonment as default) as the offense was technical in nature, caused no injury or death, and represented the accused's first offense with all shortcomings since rectified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
27-Feb-2026
Steps_Unready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
02-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
21-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
31-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1024/2025
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raigad convicted Kairav Doshi, occupier of M/s. Kairav Chemofarbe Industries Ltd., for operating a factory without complying with approved plan conditions under Rule 4(3) of the Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 10,000 fine (with 10 days simple imprisonment as default) as the offense was technical in nature, caused no injury or death, and represented the accused's first offense with all shortcomings since rectified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts