The State Through Mandava Sagari Police station vs Prashant Baburav gavand and other 1 Advocate - Patil B. G. — 169/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118 (1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 14-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG030029572024

Filing Number

2957/2024

Filing Date

02-Dec-2024

Registration No

169/2024

Registration Date

02-Dec-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

Mandwa Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118 (1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Through Mandava Sagari Police station

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prashant Baburav gavand and other 1 Advocate - Patil B. G.

  2. 2.Tukaram Harichandra Todnkar Aalias Appa Todnkar

Case History

  1. 14-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    SUMMARY: In three separate criminal proceedings (Case No. 169/2024) heard by the Raygad-Alibag Court on 03/11/2025, the court passed orders on bail petitions for witnesses in an assault case dated 08/08/2024. For witness-1 (Nazir Ali Shakir Ali Siddhki), the court rejected the bail petition, finding the accused's presence in court unnecessary and no cognizable injury warranting bail. For witness-2 (Rajesh Atmaram Patil), the court allowed the bail petition, accepting that proper identification procedures were followed and considering the police investigation adequate. For witness-3 (Kishor Anant Patil), the court directed further investigation and remanded the case to the investigating officer for completion of examination, with orders issued requiring submission of medical certificates and investigation reports to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  14. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  15. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  16. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  17. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  18. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  19. 08-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  20. 11-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  21. 11-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  22. 29-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 29-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  24. 16-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 02-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: In three separate criminal proceedings (Case No. 169/2024) heard by the Raygad-Alibag Court on 03/11/2025, the court passed orders on bail petitions for witnesses in an assault case dated 08/08/2024. For witness-1 (Nazir Ali Shakir Ali Siddhki), the court rejected the bail petition, finding the accused's presence in court unnecessary and no cognizable injury warranting bail. For witness-2 (Rajesh Atmaram Patil), the court allowed the bail petition, accepting that proper identification procedures were followed and considering the police investigation adequate. For witness-3 (Kishor Anant Patil), the court directed further investigation and remanded the case to the investigating officer for completion of examination, with orders issued requiring submission of medical certificates and investigation reports to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case