The State Through Poynad Police station vs Chandrabhushan Sivendra Sinh Advocate - Patil B. G. — 163/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106 (1), 125(A), 125(B), 281. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030028522024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
2852/2024
Filing Date
19-11-2024
Registration No
163/2024
Registration Date
19-11-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
FIR Details
FIR Number
142
Police Station
Poynad Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Through Poynad Police station
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Chandrabhushan Sivendra Sinh Advocate - Patil B. G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 14-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This case involves witness statements in a criminal matter filed by Poynad Police Station (Case 163/2024). The document contains testimonies from two witnesses describing a traffic incident involving motorcycles and allegations of assault. After hearing submissions from both the prosecution (represented by P.S. Patil) and defense counsel (B.G. Patil), the court found contradictions in the witnesses' accounts regarding the ownership and operation of the motorcycle, the location and circumstances of the incident, and whether proper procedures were followed. The court rejected the petition, finding the evidence insufficient and recording "Uttarpas Purna" (petition fully rejected) and "Feratpas Nahi" (no relief granted) on 12/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This case involves witness statements in a criminal matter filed by Poynad Police Station (Case 163/2024). The document contains testimonies from two witnesses describing a traffic incident involving motorcycles and allegations of assault. After hearing submissions from both the prosecution (represented by P.S. Patil) and defense counsel (B.G. Patil), the court found contradictions in the witnesses' accounts regarding the ownership and operation of the motorcycle, the location and circumstances of the incident, and whether proper procedures were followed. The court rejected the petition, finding the evidence insufficient and recording "Uttarpas Purna" (petition fully rejected) and "Feratpas Nahi" (no relief granted) on 12/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts