The State Through Alibag Police station vs Rupesh Ramesh Mhamulkar Advocate - Patil A.S. — 156/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(2), 281, 125 (b). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 11-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG030026872024

Filing Number

2687/2024

Filing Date

25-Oct-2024

Registration No

156/2024

Registration Date

25-Oct-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

186

Police Station

Alibag Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(2), 281, 125 (b)
Motor Vehicles Act Section 184, 3(1) / 181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Through Alibag Police station

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rupesh Ramesh Mhamulkar Advocate - Patil A.S.

Case History

  1. 11-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary This Raigad District Court order (Case No. 156/2024) addresses multiple witness statements in what appears to be a criminal investigation. The court examined testimonies from five witnesses regarding incidents that occurred on September 21, 2024, in Aliwadi area. The key findings include witness accounts of injuries, hospital treatment, vehicle involvement, and police procedures. The court found certain aspects of the testimonies credible while noting evidentiary gaps in others. The matter involves serious charges and the court has directed further investigation and documentary evidence submission by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  16. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  17. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  18. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  19. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  20. 28-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  21. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  22. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  23. 12-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 12-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 25-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 156/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This Raigad District Court order (Case No. 156/2024) addresses multiple witness statements in what appears to be a criminal investigation. The court examined testimonies from five witnesses regarding incidents that occurred on September 21, 2024, in Aliwadi area. The key findings include witness accounts of injuries, hospital treatment, vehicle involvement, and police procedures. The court found certain aspects of the testimonies credible while noting evidentiary gaps in others. The matter involves serious charges and the court has directed further investigation and documentary evidence submission by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case