The State Through Poynad Police station vs Bhushan Gopinath Gavand and other 3 Advocate - Baikar Darsshan Y. — 138/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452, 504, 506, 427, 509, 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030022222024
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2222/2024
Filing Date
23-09-2024
Registration No
138/2024
Registration Date
23-09-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
Poynad Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Through Poynad Police station
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Bhushan Gopinath Gavand and other 3 Advocate - Baikar Darsshan Y.
Kisan Tukaram Gavand
Gopinath Tukaram Gavand
Tushar Tulshiram Gavand
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a domestic violence case (FIR No. 138/2024) from Raigad, Maharashtra involving multiple allegations of cruelty and assault. The court heard testimony from the complainant (Sunita Thakur) and conducted detailed cross-examinations of both complainant and defendant witnesses. The court found inconsistencies in witness statements, incomplete evidence, and found the complainant's account lacked substantial corroboration. The bail petitions were rejected and case was adjourned for further proceedings, with the court noting investigative deficiencies in the police report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a domestic violence case (FIR No. 138/2024) from Raigad, Maharashtra involving multiple allegations of cruelty and assault. The court heard testimony from the complainant (Sunita Thakur) and conducted detailed cross-examinations of both complainant and defendant witnesses. The court found inconsistencies in witness statements, incomplete evidence, and found the complainant's account lacked substantial corroboration. The bail petitions were rejected and case was adjourned for further proceedings, with the court noting investigative deficiencies in the police report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts