The State Through Poynad Police station vs Bhushan Gopinath Gavand and other 3 Advocate - Baikar Darsshan Y. — 138/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452, 504, 506, 427, 509, 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 06-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG030022222024

Filing Number

2222/2024

Filing Date

23-Sep-2024

Registration No

138/2024

Registration Date

23-Sep-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

Poynad Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 452, 504, 506, 427, 509, 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Through Poynad Police station

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhushan Gopinath Gavand and other 3 Advocate - Baikar Darsshan Y.

  2. 2.Kisan Tukaram Gavand

  3. 3.Gopinath Tukaram Gavand

  4. 4.Tushar Tulshiram Gavand

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary This is a domestic violence case (FIR No. 138/2024) from Raigad, Maharashtra involving multiple allegations of cruelty and assault. The court heard testimony from the complainant (Sunita Thakur) and conducted detailed cross-examinations of both complainant and defendant witnesses. The court found inconsistencies in witness statements, incomplete evidence, and found the complainant's account lacked substantial corroboration. The bail petitions were rejected and case was adjourned for further proceedings, with the court noting investigative deficiencies in the police report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 02-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  16. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  17. 09-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  18. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  19. 19-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  20. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  21. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  22. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  23. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  24. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  25. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  26. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  27. 22-Apr-2025

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  28. 28-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  29. 28-Feb-2025

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  30. 22-Jan-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  31. 29-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  32. 29-Nov-2024

    Filing of Surety

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  33. 21-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  34. 21-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 23-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a domestic violence case (FIR No. 138/2024) from Raigad, Maharashtra involving multiple allegations of cruelty and assault. The court heard testimony from the complainant (Sunita Thakur) and conducted detailed cross-examinations of both complainant and defendant witnesses. The court found inconsistencies in witness statements, incomplete evidence, and found the complainant's account lacked substantial corroboration. The bail petitions were rejected and case was adjourned for further proceedings, with the court noting investigative deficiencies in the police report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case