Mahesh Gajanan Mali vs Amol Chandrakant Bhoir Advocate - Makani S.D. — 1131/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030020032023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
22-10-2023
Filing Number
1661/2023
Filing Date
23-10-2023
Registration No
1131/2023
Registration Date
23-10-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahesh Gajanan Mali
Adv. THAKUR NABHESH BHASKAR
Respondent(s)
Amol Chandrakant Bhoir Advocate - Makani S.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil case (Civil Suit No. 1131/2023) from the Raigad District Court concerning a money dispute. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit entirely (उलटपास पूर्ण = complete reversal/dismissal), finding that the defendant had already deposited the claimed amount of ₹4,50,000 in court as ordered. The judgment held that the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant's liability or produce necessary evidence, and therefore the suit was rejected on merits without any relief to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil case (Civil Suit No. 1131/2023) from the Raigad District Court concerning a money dispute. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit entirely (उलटपास पूर्ण = complete reversal/dismissal), finding that the defendant had already deposited the claimed amount of ₹4,50,000 in court as ordered. The judgment held that the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant's liability or produce necessary evidence, and therefore the suit was rejected on merits without any relief to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts