Mahesh Gajanan Mali vs Amol Chandrakant Bhoir Advocate - Makani S.D. — 1131/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030020032023
e-Filing Number
22-10-2023
Filing Number
1661/2023
Filing Date
23-Oct-2023
Registration No
1131/2023
Registration Date
23-Oct-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahesh Gajanan Mali
Adv. THAKUR NABHESH BHASKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amol Chandrakant Bhoir Advocate - Makani S.D.
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
05-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Summary This is a civil case (Civil Suit No. 1131/2023) from the Raigad District Court concerning a money dispute. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit entirely (उलटपास पूर्ण = complete reversal/dismissal), finding that the defendant had already deposited the claimed amount of ₹4,50,000 in court as ordered. The judgment held that the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant's liability or produce necessary evidence, and therefore the suit was rejected on merits without any relief to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
07-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
17-Oct-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
04-Oct-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
20-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
12-Sep-2025
Judgment
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
18-Aug-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
06-Aug-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
21-Jul-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
02-Jun-2025
Report
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
29-Apr-2025
Report
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
01-Apr-2025
Report
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
31-Jul-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
14-May-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
06-Apr-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
02-Mar-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
25-Jan-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Jan-2024
Awaiting Summons
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
12-Dec-2023
Verification
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
23-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1131/2023
Summary This is a civil case (Civil Suit No. 1131/2023) from the Raigad District Court concerning a money dispute. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit entirely (उलटपास पूर्ण = complete reversal/dismissal), finding that the defendant had already deposited the claimed amount of ₹4,50,000 in court as ordered. The judgment held that the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant's liability or produce necessary evidence, and therefore the suit was rejected on merits without any relief to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts