The State Through Mandava Sagari Police Station vs Mehbub Abdul Shaikh and other 2 Advocate - Makani S.D. — 170/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 117(2),115(2),352,351(2)(3),3(5). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030017742025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
1774/2025
Filing Date
25-07-2025
Registration No
170/2025
Registration Date
25-07-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
Mandwa Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Through Mandava Sagari Police Station
Adv. Prasad Sudam Patil App
Respondent(s)
Mehbub Abdul Shaikh and other 2 Advocate - Makani S.D.
Mandar Mahendra Rane
Prathamesh Milind Dalvi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case 170/2025 Summary The petition filed by Mandava Sagari (State through Mandava Sagari Police Station) against respondent Mehbub Abdul Shaikh and others was dismissed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raigad-Alibag on 17/11/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the necessary grounds for the case and held that the accused was not guilty of the charges levied against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 170/2025 Summary The petition filed by Mandava Sagari (State through Mandava Sagari Police Station) against respondent Mehbub Abdul Shaikh and others was dismissed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raigad-Alibag on 17/11/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the necessary grounds for the case and held that the accused was not guilty of the charges levied against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts