Sadguru Gramin Bigarsheti Shakari Patsanstha Choul through Nilesh Krushna Raut vs Dipali Vijay Gharat and other 1 Advocate - Patil A. B. — 721/2018

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG030017432023

Filing Number

1069/2018

Filing Date

19-Oct-2018

Registration No

721/2018

Registration Date

19-Oct-2018

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sadguru Gramin Bigarsheti Shakari Patsanstha Choul through Nilesh Krushna Raut

    Adv. Joshi S. N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dipali Vijay Gharat and other 1 Advocate - Patil A. B.

  2. 2.Vijay Govind Gharat

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Court Order Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal against bank-related grievances, finding insufficient evidence of wrongdoing. The court ruled that Respondent No. 1 (debtor) had validly taken the loan with proper documentation, that Respondent No. 2 was neither a debtor nor a party to the proceedings, and that the bank followed proper procedures regarding account statements and recovery efforts. The court also rejected claims of software manipulation and improper maintenance of account records, finding the bank's operations to be in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  12. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  13. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  15. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  16. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  18. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  19. 03-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  20. 29-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  21. 18-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  22. 28-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  23. 27-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  24. 14-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  25. 25-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  26. 14-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  27. 28-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  28. 12-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  29. 27-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  30. 18-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  31. 06-May-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  32. 03-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  33. 28-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  34. 22-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  35. 15-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  36. 09-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  37. 30-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  38. 20-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  39. 09-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 19-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 721/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal against bank-related grievances, finding insufficient evidence of wrongdoing. The court ruled that Respondent No. 1 (debtor) had validly taken the loan with proper documentation, that Respondent No. 2 was neither a debtor nor a party to the proceedings, and that the bank followed proper procedures regarding account statements and recovery efforts. The court also rejected claims of software manipulation and improper maintenance of account records, finding the bank's operations to be in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case