Champavati Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Pathsansth Ltd. Revdanda Through Shri. Samir Manohar Naik vs Vinod Manohar Surve Advocate - Vartak P. H. — 164/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.

N.B.W._Ready Next hearing 13-May-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG030016152023

Filing Number

206/2022

Filing Date

28-Feb-2022

Registration No

164/2022

Registration Date

28-Feb-2022

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Champavati Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Pathsansth Ltd. Revdanda Through Shri. Samir Manohar Naik

    Adv. Mhatre U. B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinod Manohar Surve Advocate - Vartak P. H.

Case History

  1. 13-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  7. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  8. 06-Oct-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  9. 22-Sep-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  10. 18-Aug-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  11. 31-Jul-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  13. 20-May-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  14. 10-May-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  15. 28-Feb-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  16. 27-Jan-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  17. 14-Jan-2025

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  18. 12-Dec-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    BAIL GRANTED. The accused Vinod Manohar Surve, charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, is released on bail of Rs. 15,000 with a surety of equal amount or cash security. He must pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000 for forfeiture of his personal bond and attend all court hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 12-Dec-2024

    Report

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  20. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  21. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  23. 27-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  24. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  25. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  26. 09-May-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  27. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  28. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  29. 24-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  30. 09-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  31. 05-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  32. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  33. 11-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 28-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 164/2022

casestatus.in Summary

BAIL GRANTED. The accused Vinod Manohar Surve, charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, is released on bail of Rs. 15,000 with a surety of equal amount or cash security. He must pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000 for forfeiture of his personal bond and attend all court hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case