Aadash Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha through Santosh Arun Mhatre vs Sangita Naresh Gayakvad — 857/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG030012642023

e-Filing Number

03-08-2023

Filing Number

1225/2023

Filing Date

03-Aug-2023

Registration No

857/2023

Registration Date

03-Aug-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aadash Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha through Santosh Arun Mhatre

    Adv. Bhakti Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sangita Naresh Gayakvad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint against Sangita Naresh Gaikwad and acquitted the accused under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure because the complainant (Aadash Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha) failed to appear or file evidence despite multiple opportunities since May 2024. The court found the complainant had abandoned the case and cancelled the accused's bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  9. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  11. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  12. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  14. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  15. 16-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  16. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  17. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  18. 26-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  19. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  20. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  21. 27-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  22. 05-May-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  23. 06-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  24. 02-Mar-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  25. 25-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 25-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  27. 09-Dec-2023

    Verification

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  28. 20-Nov-2023

    Verification

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  29. 11-Oct-2023

    Verification

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag

  30. 05-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 03-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 857/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint against Sangita Naresh Gaikwad and acquitted the accused under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure because the complainant (Aadash Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha) failed to appear or file evidence despite multiple opportunities since May 2024. The court found the complainant had abandoned the case and cancelled the accused's bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case