The State throuhg Mandava Sagari Police Station vs Anil Ashok Naik and other 4 Advocate - Parkar M. M. — 94/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030009362023
Filing Number
942/2023
Filing Date
21-Jun-2023
Registration No
94/2023
Registration Date
21-Jun-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
Mandwa Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State throuhg Mandava Sagari Police Station
Adv. Prasad Sudam Patil App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anil Ashok Naik and other 4 Advocate - Parkar M. M.
-
2.Ganpat Raja Naik
-
3.Kailash Mangesh Naik
-
4.Shivmurt Baburam Yadav
-
5.Rambaran Zinak Yadav
Case History
-
14-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
30-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: FIR No. 94/2023, Order No. 34/D and 44/D, Aalibaug Court, Maharashtra Outcome: The court dismissed the appeals filed by all accused persons (Appellants 1-5). The appeals challenging the police investigation and seizure of evidence in this theft case were rejected, and the lower court's order was upheld. The accused's contentions regarding improper investigation procedures and evidence handling were found unsubstantiated by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
19-Nov-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
31-May-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
15-Jan-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
28-Sep-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
27-Jul-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
15-May-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
06-Apr-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
04-Mar-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
01-Mar-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
09-Dec-2023
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
01-Dec-2023
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
04-Nov-2023
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
03-Oct-2023
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
09-Sep-2023
Awaiting Summons
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
28-Aug-2023
Awaiting Summons
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
26-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
17-Jul-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 94/2023
Court Order Summary Case: FIR No. 94/2023, Order No. 34/D and 44/D, Aalibaug Court, Maharashtra Outcome: The court dismissed the appeals filed by all accused persons (Appellants 1-5). The appeals challenging the police investigation and seizure of evidence in this theft case were rejected, and the lower court's order was upheld. The accused's contentions regarding improper investigation procedures and evidence handling were found unsubstantiated by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts