The State throuhg Mandava Sagari Police Station vs Anil Ashok Naik and other 4 Advocate - Parkar M. M. — 94/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030009362023
Next Hearing
14th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
942/2023
Filing Date
21-06-2023
Registration No
94/2023
Registration Date
21-06-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
Mandwa Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State throuhg Mandava Sagari Police Station
Adv. Prasad Sudam Patil App
Respondent(s)
Anil Ashok Naik and other 4 Advocate - Parkar M. M.
Ganpat Raja Naik
Kailash Mangesh Naik
Shivmurt Baburam Yadav
Rambaran Zinak Yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: FIR No. 94/2023, Order No. 34/D and 44/D, Aalibaug Court, Maharashtra Outcome: The court dismissed the appeals filed by all accused persons (Appellants 1-5). The appeals challenging the police investigation and seizure of evidence in this theft case were rejected, and the lower court's order was upheld. The accused's contentions regarding improper investigation procedures and evidence handling were found unsubstantiated by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: FIR No. 94/2023, Order No. 34/D and 44/D, Aalibaug Court, Maharashtra Outcome: The court dismissed the appeals filed by all accused persons (Appellants 1-5). The appeals challenging the police investigation and seizure of evidence in this theft case were rejected, and the lower court's order was upheld. The accused's contentions regarding improper investigation procedures and evidence handling were found unsubstantiated by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts