The State Through Poynad Police station vs Nagesh Rama Lendi and other — 51/2024

Case under Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act Section 5,5(A),5(B),9. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG030008592024

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

14th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

859/2024

Filing Date

02-04-2024

Registration No

51/2024

Registration Date

02-04-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

Poynad Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act Section 5,5(A),5(B),9
Prevention Of Cruelty to Animal Act Section 11

Petitioner(s)

The State Through Poynad Police station

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Nagesh Rama Lendi and other

Shashikant Damodar Hambir

Salman Karim Shekh

Sarfaraj Maunuddin Patel

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG

06-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

05-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

15-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

04-08-2025
Evidence
09-03-2026
Evidence

Court Order Summary Case No. 51/2024 (Raigad District Court) This order pertains to criminal proceedings involving charges under IPC Section 65B (digital evidence). The court rejected the accused's bail pleas in multiple connected cases (Order No. 24/K, 31/K, and 44/KDL). The court found the prosecution's evidence regarding seized motorcycles, photographs, and technical evidence to be credible, noting discrepancies in the accused's statements and insufficient grounds for bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case No. 51/2024 (Raigad District Court) This order pertains to criminal proceedings involving charges under IPC Section 65B (digital evidence). The court rejected the accused's bail pleas in multiple connected cases (Order No. 24/K, 31/K, and 44/KDL). The court found the prosecution's evidence regarding seized motorcycles, photographs, and technical evidence to be credible, noting discrepancies in the accused's statements and insufficient grounds for bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case