Dist.Cast Verification Committee Raigad Thr V.V.Chavan vs Nutan Dilip Thorave Nutan Aalkesh Patil Advocate - Thakur P. M. — 246/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,468,471,199,200. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030002302017
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
472/2017
Filing Date
26-12-2017
Registration No
246/2017
Registration Date
26-12-2017
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dist.Cast Verification Committee Raigad Thr V.V.Chavan
Adv. P.P.
Respondent(s)
Nutan Dilip Thorave Nutan Aalkesh Patil Advocate - Thakur P. M.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Evidence
Charge
Charge
Evidence Before Charge
Evidence Before Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-05-2026 | Charge |
| 13-04-2026 | Charge |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 246/2017 In this caste verification case before the Raigad District Court, the petitioner (District Caste Verification Committee through V.V. Chavan) challenged a caste certificate issued to respondent Nutan Dilip Thorave. The court found discrepancies in the caste documentation—the respondent's caste was listed as "Maratha" in some records and "Kunbi" in others. After examining evidence including school records and documents, the court determined the caste claim lacked proper verification. The petition was allowed and the matter was referred to Judgment Order No. 60. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 246/2017 In this caste verification case before the Raigad District Court, the petitioner (District Caste Verification Committee through V.V. Chavan) challenged a caste certificate issued to respondent Nutan Dilip Thorave. The court found discrepancies in the caste documentation—the respondent's caste was listed as "Maratha" in some records and "Kunbi" in others. After examining evidence including school records and documents, the court determined the caste claim lacked proper verification. The petition was allowed and the matter was referred to Judgment Order No. 60. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts