The State through Mandva Sagari Police Station vs Archana Arvinad Ziradkar and other 1 Advocate - Patil G. M. — 95/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030001332019
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
126/2019
Filing Date
17-07-2019
Registration No
95/2019
Registration Date
17-07-2019
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
Mandwa Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State through Mandva Sagari Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Archana Arvinad Ziradkar and other 1 Advocate - Patil G. M.
Dhananjay Arvind Ziradkar @ Dhananjay Ramesh Gauda
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The court documents contain multiple witness statements (khutla) in a criminal case (Case No. 95/2019) from the Raigad-Alibag court. The petitions primarily concern financial disputes and allegations of fraud involving property transactions and money lending. In the orders reviewed, the court accepted some witness testimonies while rejecting others based on credibility and corroborating evidence. The case involves disputes over land ownership, loan repayment obligations, and property-related transactions between various parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court documents contain multiple witness statements (khutla) in a criminal case (Case No. 95/2019) from the Raigad-Alibag court. The petitions primarily concern financial disputes and allegations of fraud involving property transactions and money lending. In the orders reviewed, the court accepted some witness testimonies while rejecting others based on credibility and corroborating evidence. The case involves disputes over land ownership, loan repayment obligations, and property-related transactions between various parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts