Sheshrao Baburao Suryawanshi, Asst.Police commisioner Panvel vs Mahesh Ratan Baladi Advocate - Bangera A.S. — 83/2020
Case under Environment (protection) Act Section 15. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030000862020
Filing Number
81/2020
Filing Date
01-10-2020
Registration No
83/2020
Registration Date
01-10-2020
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sheshrao Baburao Suryawanshi, Asst.Police commisioner Panvel
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mahesh Ratan Baladi Advocate - Bangera A.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted Mahesh Ratan Baldi of noise pollution charges under the Environment Protection Act, 1986, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key deficiencies included unreliable electronic evidence lacking mandatory Section 65-B certification, technical issues with sound-measuring device calibration, unsigned reports, failure to corroborate with independent panch witnesses, inability to establish direct nexus to the accused's mandal amid multiple simultaneous processions, and absence of material evidence like seized instruments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted Mahesh Ratan Baldi of noise pollution charges under the Environment Protection Act, 1986, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key deficiencies included unreliable electronic evidence lacking mandatory Section 65-B certification, technical issues with sound-measuring device calibration, unsigned reports, failure to corroborate with independent panch witnesses, inability to establish direct nexus to the accused's mandal amid multiple simultaneous processions, and absence of material evidence like seized instruments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts