The State through Uran Police Station vs Sunil Janardan Pednekar and other 3 Advocate - Bangera A.S. — 82/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,324,323,504,506(2),34. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030000852020
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
80/2020
Filing Date
01-10-2020
Registration No
82/2020
Registration Date
01-10-2020
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State through Uran Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sunil Janardan Pednekar and other 3 Advocate - Bangera A.S.
Pravin Janardan Pednekar
Mahesh Ratanlal Baladi
Ganesh Sadashiv Patil At. Nagaon Road, Bapusheth Wadi, Chintamani Socity, Tal. Uran.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 06-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 04-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 02-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 23-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Interim Orders
Summary In criminal case FIR No. 82/2020 (Raigad District Court), the court examined multiple witness statements regarding an alleged assault on a child on March 4-5, 2010. The medical evidence showed simple injuries (swelling and contusions) without fractures or serious harm. The court found significant inconsistencies and contradictions between the accused's accounts, witness testimonies, and medical findings, ultimately dismissing the charges due to insufficient credible evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In criminal case FIR No. 82/2020 (Raigad District Court), the court examined multiple witness statements regarding an alleged assault on a child on March 4-5, 2010. The medical evidence showed simple injuries (swelling and contusions) without fractures or serious harm. The court found significant inconsistencies and contradictions between the accused's accounts, witness testimonies, and medical findings, ultimately dismissing the charges due to insufficient credible evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts