Mayur Kashinath Gharat vs Sunil Janardan Pednekar and other 8 Advocate - Bangera A.S. — 81/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,324,323,354,504,506(2),34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030000842020
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
79/2020
Filing Date
01-10-2020
Registration No
81/2020
Registration Date
01-10-2020
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mayur Kashinath Gharat
Adv. More A. A.
Respondent(s)
Sunil Janardan Pednekar and other 8 Advocate - Bangera A.S.
Pravin Janardan Pednekar
Mahesh Ratanlal Baladi
Ganesh Sadashiv Patil
Achal Narayan Mukadam
Nilesh Madhukar Patil
Madhav Subhash Kulkarni
Sagar Suresh Ghosalkar
Mahesh Yadav Vartak
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 06-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 04-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 02-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Chief Judicial Magistrate rejected the discharge application filed by accused nos. 1-4 and 6-8 under Section 245 CrPC. The court found sufficient evidence (complainant testimony, eyewitness account, and medical evidence) to frame charges for assault and criminal intimidation offenses. The court held that since the police case involves only four accused while the complaint names nine accused, Section 210 CrPC permits the complaint case to proceed, and double jeopardy provisions do not apply as both cases are being tried simultaneously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Chief Judicial Magistrate rejected the discharge application filed by accused nos. 1-4 and 6-8 under Section 245 CrPC. The court found sufficient evidence (complainant testimony, eyewitness account, and medical evidence) to frame charges for assault and criminal intimidation offenses. The court held that since the police case involves only four accused while the complaint names nine accused, Section 210 CrPC permits the complaint case to proceed, and double jeopardy provisions do not apply as both cases are being tried simultaneously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts