The State Through Revdanda Police Station vs Rohit Ganesh Waghmare and other — 8/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1), 115(2), 352, 3(5). Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND RELEASED ON PROBATION on 27th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030000292025
Filing Number
29/2025
Filing Date
02-Jan-2025
Registration No
8/2025
Registration Date
02-Jan-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND RELEASED ON PROBATION
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
164
Police Station
Revdanda Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Through Revdanda Police Station
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rohit Ganesh Waghmare and other
-
2.Ganesh Rajaram Waghmare
-
3.Raju Balu Pawar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raigad convicted Rohit Ganesh Waghmare (23 years old) under Section 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for voluntarily causing hurt with a beer bottle, while acquitting his father Ganesh Rajaram Waghmare and relative Raju Balu Pawar due to insufficient evidence of their participation. The court granted Waghmare probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of imprisonment, citing his young age, absence of prior criminal record, and the unpremeditated nature of the incident, while ordering him to deposit ₹5,000 as compensation to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgment
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgment
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgment
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
07-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
29-Jan-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
21-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
07-Jan-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
17-Nov-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
29-Oct-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
25-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
11-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-Alibag
-
14-Jan-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
14-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2025
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raigad convicted Rohit Ganesh Waghmare (23 years old) under Section 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for voluntarily causing hurt with a beer bottle, while acquitting his father Ganesh Rajaram Waghmare and relative Raju Balu Pawar due to insufficient evidence of their participation. The court granted Waghmare probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of imprisonment, citing his young age, absence of prior criminal record, and the unpremeditated nature of the incident, while ordering him to deposit ₹5,000 as compensation to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts