Union of India vs Govind Narayan P. Mundra 5 Advocate - Adv. R.V.Oak Perulekar — 64/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 32. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHRG020000902007
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
200030/2007
Filing Date
31-01-2007
Registration No
64/2025
Registration Date
02-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Raigarh
Judge
7-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Judge Alibag
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Union of India
Adv. Thosar Shriram
Respondent(s)
Govind Narayan P. Mundra 5 Advocate - Adv. R.V.Oak Perulekar
Ghanshyam p. Mundra Dec. Through Sushma Ghanshyam Mundra Dec. Utpal Ghanshyam Mundra
Ghanshyam p. Mundra Dec. Through Sushma Ghanshyam Mundra Dec. Anoop Ghanshyam Mundra
Vishwanath M. Date Dec. Jyotsna Hemant Shidhaye
Vishwanath M. Date Dec. Sunita yashwant Ranade
Vaizanath M. Date dec. Shrikant vaijanath date
Vaizanath M. Date Dec. through Sudha Nilkanath joshi
Vaizanath M. Date Dec. Through Mangala Vaijanath Date
Ganesh M. Date Dec. Through Ashok Ganesh Date Dec Through Archana Ashok Date
Ganesh M. Date Dec. Through Ashok ganesh date Dec. through Shubhanan Ashok date
Ganesh M. Date Dec. Through Ashok Ganesh Date Dec. Suhasini Sanjay Mahadik
Arun G. Date Dec. Through Devyaani Arun Date
Arun G. Date Dec. Through Kumari Prachi Arun Date
Arun G. Date Dec. Through Rishikesh Arun Date
Nirmalabai g. Gate Dec. Through Ashok Ganesh Date
Nirmalabai g. Gate Dec. Through Arun Ganesh Date
Nirmalabai g. Gate Dec. Through Alka Ashok Barve
The State of Maharashtra Through The collector Raigad
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Judge Alibag
Evidence
Evidence
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 17-02-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 06-02-2026 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
The court allowed the petition and ordered that the State Company be impleaded as a necessary party to the case, recognizing that property transferred to Mumbai Special Economic Zone Company Ltd. requires the company's involvement for proper adjudication. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 with the government as a condition for the petition's acceptance and to file a properly drafted petition within the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts