State of Maharashtra vs Ramesh Ambaji Patil — 55/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(i)(m),65(1),74,75(1)(1)(4),79,249,253,351(2). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG010014672024
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
359/2024
Filing Date
28-11-2024
Registration No
55/2024
Registration Date
28-11-2024
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
149
Police Station
Wadkhal Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Ambaji Patil
Nandkumar Ramesh Patil
Satish Ramesh Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Charge |
| 20-04-2026 | Charge |
| 25-03-2026 | Charge |
| 12-03-2026 | Charge |
| 05-03-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 55/2024 Discharge Application REJECTED. The Special POCSO Court rejected the discharge applications filed by accused No.2 (Nandakumar Ramesh Patil) and No.3 (Satish Ramesh Patil) on technical grounds—the application was filed on 16-06-2025, exceeding the 60-day statutory deadline under Section 250(1) BNSS from the accused's first court appearance on 02-12-2024. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence against these two accused for harboring their father (Accused No.1), noting contradictions in complainant's statements and lack of witness evidence. The case is scheduled for charge framing on 09-01-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 55/2024 Discharge Application REJECTED. The Special POCSO Court rejected the discharge applications filed by accused No.2 (Nandakumar Ramesh Patil) and No.3 (Satish Ramesh Patil) on technical grounds—the application was filed on 16-06-2025, exceeding the 60-day statutory deadline under Section 250(1) BNSS from the accused's first court appearance on 02-12-2024. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence against these two accused for harboring their father (Accused No.1), noting contradictions in complainant's statements and lack of witness evidence. The case is scheduled for charge framing on 09-01-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts